Wisconsin has a statute that covers such non-competition prohibitions (section 103.465). The law expressly states that if the non-competition agreement is reasonably necessary to protect the employer and the scope of the agreement is reasonable, both in terms of geographical location and time constraints, it is applicable. Employers in another state – whose activities have expanded to Wisconsin – often use their original state contract to not compete. They also often contain a provision of legal choice, which their state law designates as control. Increasingly, employers are requiring their workers to sign non-compete agreements, confidentiality agreements, non-appeal agreements or other agreements that limit a worker`s ability to work after employment. Whether an employer requires a worker to sign such an agreement as a condition at the beginning of the employment relationship or during the employment relationship, the applicability of the non-competition clause depends on a complex set of legal factors and the interpretation of a number of court decisions. Before signing a non-compete clause, Wisconsin workers should review the agreement with a lawyer to understand their rights and ensure their future livelihood. These justifications for the applicability of a non-compete clause raise several non-competition issues inherent in each case. What was the employee`s relationship with the client? How long has this relationship been? Is the customer a current or a previous customer? Yes, yes. However, the legality of the employer taking adverse action against you – as they lay off or write to you – to know whether they refuse to sign depends on the circumstances of your case and may depend on whether the agreement the employer wants you to sign is applicable under your state law. Contract law issues in your state can also be a factor in implementing an agreement that requires you to sign or is threatened. One is whether your employer is required to pay you extra money or to give you other consideration, as was said in the previous question.
In addition, the employer may claim any actual damages or losses they claim because the worker left in violation of the non-compete agreement – this could include customer loss of earnings, loss of secret employer information and other similar losses. Does the employer have a legitimate interest that it protects by the non-compete agreement? Non-competition agreements, also known as non-competition or competition restriction agreements, are very common in employment contracts, job applications and business sales contracts. The general objective of these agreements is to limit the ability of workers who sign the agreement to work against the employer in a specific geographical area for a certain period of time. If you sign it, you generally accept that you do not compete with your employer by participating in a similar business, as an employee, independent contractor, owner, owner, major investor and regardless of any other form of competition that your employer identifies to cover its base.